Wednesday, November 29, 2023

Malcolm X and Booker T. Washington: Two Drastically Different Thinkers with an Incredible Work Ethic

                 "Up From Slavery" and "The Autobiography of Malcolm X" both share first person narratives of black civil rights activists---more importantly, the stories highlight two figures with different approaches to achieving justice. Despite their differing ideologies, both Booker T. Washington and Malcolm X had to adapt to the American system in a major way: by adopting relentless work ethics. Here, I argue that Malcolm X had a more humanitarian, community-driven notion of hard-work, while Booker T. Washington worked hard to promote individuality for other black Americans. These contrasting motives meant Malcolm and Washington had notably different impacts on the Civil Rights scene.

                Malcolm X's autobiography distinguishes between his "private" and "public" persona. Publicly, he was not afraid of intimidating white America (which can't be said about Booker T. Washington), and as a result many thinkers of the time were unwilling to debate him (preface). Malcolm X gained notoriety among various communities (both black and white) for his "straight-to-the-point" mentality, which made sense given the circumstances he grew up in. Since his birth, the Ku Klux Klan tried to oust Malcolm X from his hometown of Omaha. Additionally, his father was a staunch support of Marcus Garvey and the "Back to Africa" movement, a system which "stressed becoming independent of the white man" (16). Thus, Malcolm's public hatred for the actions of white people seems to have stemmed from his early life.

Malcolm X

                    However, his "private" persona offers another interesting story---one that entails the life experiences which created Detroit Red and led to el-Hajj Malik el-Shabazz. This name-shift was an innate effect of Malcolm X's conversion to Islam, and more specifically his relation to Elijah Muhammad. Especially after being put in jail, Malcolm X's changing demeanor and ideologies demonstrated his humanity; he was willing to accept his imperfections and work to change them by interacting with others (e.g. other inmates, religious leaders, etc.) He was not afraid to display how malleable his perspectives were while incarcerated. The best example of this is likely Malcolm's unstable relationship with his brother, Reginald. Reginald grew up with Malcom in Detroit, but upon educating himself on the teaching of Elijah Muhammad, Malcolm lost faith in his sibling. He was taught by the church of Islam to think of his brother as a cretin who had no moral restraint (ironically the same man who introduced Malcolm to Islam), and held this belief for quite some time. Malcolm later regrets this behavior, though, and says the following: "after Elijah Muhammad himself was later accused as a very immoral man, I came to believe that it wasn't a divine chastisement upon Reginald, but the pain he felt when his own family totally rejected him for Elijah Muhammad, and this hurt made Reginald turn insanely upon Elijah Muhammad" (124). Clearly, Malcolm X's personal narrative is one of empathy and personal growth, as he fully admits to his development as a thinker not coming naturally. Ultimately, his story was focused on interactions with others and communicating to find ways to retaliate against injustices

                    In contrast, Booker T. Washington chose to basically ignore the post-abolition racism in America. His story was that of rigid individualism, and he didn't mention his humanity in writing too much; rather, he viewed life as a series of obstacles which must be overcome to achieve "greatness". Success was linked to intellect for Washington, and thus his main goal since childhood---as detailed in "Up From Slavery---was to receive a solid education.  He describes what it was like to get freed from a plantation, and the sort of directionless future his family looked upon, but doesn't dwell on the systemic injustice too much. He simply works away, in order to gain increments of small wages that could help make his life better (child labor). This perspective is held by Washington for multiple decades of his life, and he never changed it, even when others tried to make him re-consider his beliefs (like Malcolm X did).

                   For Washington, the motivation to work hard was obvious: he didn't want to end up uneducated and deformed like coal miners (38-43). Even though white Americans had a much easier life path than him, Booker T. Washington insisted upon focusing on just making the best of what his environment provided to him; if he worked hard enough and focused on himself, no matter how unfair his life was, he'd be bound to find success. For example, to gain admission to a selective boarding school, Washington had to constantly clean the building, purely relying on the fact that some higher-up would be impressed by this and let him enroll. A powerful statement in his autobiography is that "sweeping of [the classroom] was [his] college examination", and I think this best represents Washington's mindset (53). Booker T. Washington never really changed his views to accomodate to his surroundings (like Malcolm X did), rather he worked hard enough so that his surroundings would accept his views.

                                                                   Booker T. Washington

                    When we reflect upon great African-American social and political figures, we're inclined to divide them based on their disagreements. This method is useful, because it's important to note how Malcolm X and Booker T. Washington's agenda for black people differed. Washington obviously lived in a different time, when he still had to appeal to white people to even get published, and thus his views may seem a bit simplistic/unrealistic. He focused much more on the prosperity of the individual black American, and how they could be successful through hard work, while Malcolm X brought attention to systemic injustics and the perpetual cruelty of white people. Nowadays, we may groan at this sort of Washington "meritocracy", because obviously just working hard didn't stop the plight of black people, but I think it's vital to put the thinkers in the context of their time. Both Malcolm X and Booker T. Washington had incredible work ethics and challenged social norms (it was still incredibly rare for a post-abolition black man to receive a formal education like Booker T. Washington did). As such, both figures are deserving of being looked up to as influential people.


Source links:

https://www.google.com/books/edition/Up_From_Slavery/xN45ZsUMgKEC?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover

https://antilogicalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/malcom-x.pdf




               

                

Malcolm X and Booker T. Washington: Two Drastically Different Thinkers with an Incredible Work Ethic

                     "Up From Slavery" and "The Autobiography of Malcolm X" both share first person narratives of black ...